Association between ERG11 Gene and Azole Resistance among Candida Isolates from Chronic Kidney Disease Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46966/msjar.v7i3.420Keywords:
Candida; ERG11; azole resistance; fluconazole; voriconazole; chronic kidney disease; hemodialysis; oropharyngeal candidiasisAbstract
Background: Chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis are vulnerable to oropharyngeal Candida infection because of immune dysfunction, uremia-related changes, frequent healthcare exposure, and altered oral conditions. Azole antifungals remain widely used for mucosal candidiasis, but resistance is increasingly reported. The ERG11 gene encodes lanosterol 14-alpha-demethylase, the main azole target, and is therefore an important molecular marker to investigate in Candida isolates. Objective: This study evaluated the detection of ERG11 and its relationship with fluconazole and voriconazole resistance among Candida isolates obtained from chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis. Methods: This study was designed as a hospital-based cross-sectional observational study. Oral swabs were collected from hemodialysis patients and Candida isolates were identified by conventional culture and species-level laboratory methods. Antifungal susceptibility to fluconazole and voriconazole was determined, and ERG11 was detected by PCR. Associations between ERG11 positivity and azole resistance were analyzed using categorical statistical tests, with P <= 0.05 considered significant. Results: 96 Candida-positive isolates were identified. Candida albicans was the predominant species, representing 75/96 (78.1%) isolates. Fluconazole resistance was detected in 60/96 (62.5%) isolates, while voriconazole resistance was detected in 54/96 (56.2%). ERG11 was positive in 81/96 (84.4%) isolates. Fluconazole resistance was higher among ERG11-positive isolates than ERG11-negative isolates (65.4% vs. 46.7%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.16). Voriconazole resistance was also not significantly associated with ERG11 positivity (55.6% vs. 60.0%, P = 0.74). Conclusion: ERG11 was frequently detected among Candida isolates from hemodialysis patients; however, its presence alone was not significantly associated with azole resistance. These findings suggest that ERG11 detection is useful for molecular characterization, but mutation analysis and gene expression testing are needed to clarify its functional role in resistance.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Noor Mutar Abdul-Kareem, Shrouk Abdulrazak Hassan Al.Ibraheem, Wijdan Nizar Ibrahim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the Medical Science Journal for Advance Research, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Medical Science Journal for Advance Research agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Medical Science Journal for Advance Research right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Medical Science Journal for Advance Research published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


















