Explore Outcomes of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Classical Oxygen Therapy in Infants with Acute Bronchiolitis: A Comparative Clinical Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46966/msjar.v7i3.450Keywords:
cute bronchiolitis; high-flow nasal cannula; HFNC; oxygen therapy; infants; Modified Tal scoreAbstract
Background: Acute bronchiolitis is a major cause of hospitalization in infancy and supportive oxygen therapy forms an important part of management in hypoxemic patients. High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy has been increasingly used as an alternative to conventional low flow oxygen, particularly in infants with respiratory distress. Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of HFNC therapy with standard oxygen therapy in infants hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis. Methods: A comparative clinical study was performed in the general pediatric ward of Karbala Teaching Hospital for Children from January 1 to February 29, 2024 on 100 infants (aged 2–12 months) clinically diagnosed bronchiolitis; standard oxygen therapy (50) and HFNC therapy (50). Standard oxygen was administered through nasal cannula at 1–2 L/min and HFNC at 1–2 L/kg/min with fraction of inspired oxygen adjusted according to oxygen saturation. Clinical severity was assessed by Modified Tal score. The main outcomes were treatment failure, clinical severity after 24 hours and hospital stay length. Results: Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups. Initial Modified Tal scores did not differ significantly between standard oxygen and HFNC groups (7.00 ± 1.37 vs. 7.58 ± 2.02; p=0.090). At 24 hours, clinical severity score was lower in HFNC group than standard oxygen group (5.08 ± 2.28 vs. 6.96 ± 2.09; mean difference 1.88; 95% CI 1.03–2.74; p<0.001). Mean hospital stay was shorter in HFNC group (3.58 ± 1.26 vs. 4.68 ± 2.76 days; mean difference 1.10 days; 95% CI 0.25–1.95; p=0.011). Treatment failure occurred in 19 (38%) infants on standard oxygen but none among infants receiving HFNC. Conclusion: In infants hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis HFNC therapy was associated with greater improvement in clinical severity at 24 hours, fewer treatment failures and shorter hospital stay than standard oxygen therapy. Further multicenter studies are needed to confirm these results.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Layth Falah, Aqeel Mahdi, Mohaimen Abdulmilk Alkabi, Marysm Zuhair ALmusawi, Masara Hashim Alaraji, Shaima Jabbar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the Medical Science Journal for Advance Research, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Medical Science Journal for Advance Research agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Medical Science Journal for Advance Research right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Medical Science Journal for Advance Research published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


















