Main Article Content


Introduction: A congenital abnormality is referred to as a congenital illness or deformity. In the first four weeks of life, 276,000 newborns die from congenital impairments, giving birth to a total of around 3 million fetuses and babies; these fetuses and infants are affected by abdominal fetal deformities. Each demographic has a different prevalence of birth defects.

Using standard ultrasonography, we set out to find out how often it is to see congenital fetal abdominal abnormalities in Gujrat District of Pakistan.

Methods: From January 2022 to June 2022, researchers will conduct cross-sectional study at the Azeem Diagnostic Center Gujrat. 397 This research included pregnant women in the first, second, and third trimesters. Statistical analysis of prenatal ultrasound findings was carried out via the use of a structured questionnaire. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant when using the Chi-square test to look for a relationship. Odds Ratio was used to calculate illness risk.

Results: Twenty separate pregnant women who had ultrasounds had fetal congenital impairments discovered. Patients with Atresia or Renal Agenesis are nine times more likely to have an Omphalocele than those without (odds ratio = 0.994, 95 percent confidence range = 0.986-1.002).

Conclusion: It is a noninvasive imaging technique that is incredibly sensitive and accurate while also being quite affordable in the hands of a skilled professional. At least during the second trimester, obstetricians should encourage their patients to get regular ultrasounds.


Congenital anomalies, Prenatal, Ultrasonography, frequency

Article Details

How to Cite
Hasan, A. ., Ahmad Naeem, M. ., Ali, A. ., Arshad, N. ., Naqi Abbas, S. ., & Mumtaz, H. . (2022). Frequency Of Fetal Congenital Abdominal Anomalies Diagnosed On Ultrasound In Gujrat Pakistan: A Cross-sectional Study . Medical Science Journal for Advance Research, 3(3), 90–98.


  1. Putra RAJIJoO, Science G. Prevalence of Congenital Anomalies on Routine Ultrasound Examination of Second and Third Trimester Pregnancy. 2019;2(2s):44-9.
  2. Putra RA. Prevalence of Congenital Anomalies on Routine Ultrasound Examination of Second and Third Trimester of Pregnancy in Cikalong Wetan Hospital. 2018.
  3. Erős FR, Beke AJCAFtEttN. Congenital fetal anomalies and the role of prenatal ultrasound. 2018:1.
  4. Crane JP, LeFevre ML, Winborn RC, Evans JK, Ewigman BG, Bain RP, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on the detection, management, and outcome of anomalous fetuses. 2015;171(2):392-9.
  5. Jehangir W, Ali F, Jahangir T, Masood MSJAoPMC. Prevalence of gross congenital malformations at birth in the neonates in a tertiary care hospital. 2009;3(1):47-50.
  6. Biri A, ONAN M, TIRAŞ MB, Korucuoğlu Ü. Birth prevalence and distribution of congenital anomalies in a university hospital. 2005.
  7. Padma S, Bai P J, PV RJJoN. Pattern of distribution of congenital anomalies in stillborns: A hospital based prospective study. 2011;25(1):49-52.
  8. Taboo ZJTIpmj. Prevalence and risk factors for congenital anomalies in Mosul city. 2012;11(2):458-70.
  9. Akinmoladun J, Anumba DJTJoO, Gynaecology. Fetal imaging and diagnosis services in developing countries–A call to action. 2019;36(1):1-7.
  10. Control CfD, Prevention. Improved national prevalence estimates for 18 selected major birth defects--United States, 2003-2004. 2006;54(51):1301-5.
  11. Dulgheroff FF, Peixoto AB, Petrini CG, Caldas TMRdC, Ramos DR, Magalhães FO, et al. Fetal structural anomalies diagnosed during the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy using ultrasonography: a retrospective cohort study. 2020;137:391-400.
  12. Salmon L, Alfirevic Z, Berghella VJUOG. On behalf of the ISUOG Clinical Standard Committee Practice Guidelines for Performance of the Routine Mid-trimester Fetal Ultrasound Scan. 2011;37:116-26.
  13. Mahela S, Talukdar BJIJoR, Contraception, Obstetrics, Gynecology. Prevalence of congenital abnormalities on routine ultrasound scan of second and third trimester pregnancy. 2016;5(1):182-6.
  14. Lee RS, Cendron M, Kinnamon DD, Nguyen HTJP. Antenatal hydronephrosis as a predictor of postnatal outcome: a meta-analysis. 2006;118(2):586-93
  15. Mathew G and Agha R, for the STROCSS Group. STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the Reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in Surgery. International Journal of Surgery 2021;96:106165
  16. Browse the Registry - Research Registry
  17. Analysis of frequency of congenital fetal anomalies diagnosed on antenatal ultrasound in a tertiary care hospital of Balochistan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 54: 271-271.
  18. Kishore K, Dey M, Gaba A, et al. Antenatally diagnosed congenital anomalies-trend in tertiary care hospital. IJRCOG. Vol 10, Issue 3. 2022.
  19. Nosheen Rehan, Rehan Farooqui, Talha Ahmad Farooqui. Frequency of Congenital Fetal Anomalies and Associated Risk Factors Among Patients of the Radiology Department of Frontier Medical and Dental College Abbottabad. Proceedings SZPGMI. Vol 33, isuue 1. 23-29. 2019. Untitled-1 (
  20. Abebe S, Gebru G, Amenu D, Mekonnen Z, Dube L (2021) Risk factors associated with congenital anomalies among newborns in southwestern Ethiopia: A case-control study. PLOS ONE 16(1): e0245915.
  21. Moraes CL, Melo NCE, Amaral WND. Frequency of Congenital Anomalies in the Brazilian Midwest and the Association with Maternal Risk Factors: Case-control Study. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020 Apr;42(4):188-193. English. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709692. Epub 2020 Apr 24. PMID: 32330960.
  22. Onyambu, C.K., Tharamba, N.M. Screening for congenital fetal anomalies in low risk pregnancy: the Kenyatta National Hospital experience. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 18, 180 (2018).

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>