Main Article Content
Aims and objectives: To find out the frequency of kUB stones in patients with flank pain. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was done at the Radiology Department of DHQ Hospital, Gujrat. It includes a total 61 patients who presented with flank pain. The age range of patients was between 21 to 75 years and included 35 males and 26 females. SPSS was then used for Statistical analysis. Frequency of renal tract stones was calculated. Results: - Out of 61 patients who presented with flank pain, stones were present in 45 (73.7%) patients. 17( 27.9%) stones were seen in right kidney, 12(19.7%) stones were seen in left kidney,13(21.3%) in right ureter and 3(4.91%) in left ureter.
Conclusion: - Sonography is an excellent modality with many benefits for diagnosing kidney stones it is non-ionizing radiation free, relatively inexpensive, widely available, and simple to use, with a high diagnostic effectiveness. It is concluded patients that are reported with flank pain have kidney stones.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Alexander RT, Hemmelgarn BR, Wiebe N et al. Kidney stones and kidney function loss: a cohort study. BMJ 2012; 345: e5287
- El-Zoghby ZM, Lieske JC, Foley RN et al. Urolithiasis and the risk of ESRD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 7: 1409– 15
- Mao S, Jiang H, Wu Z, Fang Z, Xia G, Ding Q. Urolithiasis: the most risk for nephrectomy in nonrenal tumor patients. J Endourol 2012; 26: 1356– 60
- Yanagawa M, Kawamura J, Onishi T, Soga N, Kameda K, Sriboon-lue P, et al. Incidence of urolithiasis in northeast Thailand. Int J Urol1997;4(6):537–40.
- Bartoletti R, Cai T, Mondaini N, Melone F, Travaglini F, Carini M, et al.Epidemiology and risk factors in urolithiasis. Urol Int 2007;79(Suppl.1):3–7.
- S. B. N. Kumar, K. G. Kumar, V. Srinivasa, and S. Bilal, “A review on urolithiasis,” International Journal of Universal Pharmacy and Life Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 269–280, 2012.
- J. M. Teichman and M. H. Joel, “Acute renal colic from ureteral calculus,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 350, no. 7, pp. 684–693, 2004.
- Nicolau C, Claudon M, Derchi LE, Adam E, Nielsen M, Mostbeck G, et al. Imaging patients with renal colic—consider ultrasound first. Insights Imaging. 2015
- Kalantarinia K. Novel Imaging Techniques in Acute Kidney Injury. Curr Drug Targets. 2009;10(12):1184–1189.
- Kanno T, Kubota M, Sakamoto M, Nishiyama R, Okada T, Higashi Y, et al. Determining the efficacy of ultrasonography for the detection of ureteral stone. Urology. 2014;84(3):533–537. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2014.04.047.
- Brisbane W, Bailey MR, Sorensen MD. An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13(11):654–662. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2016.154.
- Robertson WG, Peacock M, Hodgkinson A. The effect of dietary changes on the incidence of urinary calculi in the UK between 1958 and 1976. J Chron Dis 1979; 32: 469– 76
- Robertson WG, Heyburn PJ, Peacock M, Hanes F, Swaminathan R. The effect of a high animal protein intake on the risk of calcium stone-formation in the urinary tract. Clin Sci 1979; 57: 285– 8
- Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ. A prospective study of dietary calcium and other nutrients and the risk of symptomatic kidney stones. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 833– 8
- Stamtelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM Jr, Curhan GC. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States:1976-1994. Kidney Int 2003; 63: 1817– 23
- Hesse A, Brändle E, Wilbert D, Köhrmann KU, Alken P. Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 709– 13
- Turney BW, Reynard JM. NobleJG, Keoghane SR. Trends in urological stone disease. BJU Int 2012; 109: 1082– 7
- Safarinejad MR. Adult urolithiasis in a population-based study in Iran: prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Urol Res 2007; 35: 73– 82
- Trinchieri A, Coppi F, Montanari E, Nero AD, Zanetti G, Pisani E. Increase in the prevalence of symptomatic upper urinary track stones during the last ten years. Eur Urol 2000; 37: 23– 5